Power company Debate (the city Hall meeting from the resident ~Greta)

I represent the resident of this town where you are considering building the new power plant. We don't want to have the instrument nearby our houses:" NIMBY".
Here are some feedbacks to you.
1. For energy company:
Even though you said nuclear power source cost inexpensive and the nuclear waste can be stored in the ground, it is still the potential dangerous because no body can make sure it won’t come out. In addition, its radioactive substance can extend very big area and won’t disappear. It is certainly clear that the result can not be counted by money.
Moreover, there is another option, which is the solar energy. It is nonpolluting energy but it is not cheap, it is hard to grasp the solar energy and different to maintain. In other words, it does not have economic effects; it will waste people’s money.

2. For energy consumer:
In fact, we all are the consumers; it is better to think about how to decrease our billing for daily electric cost. Therefore, we should consider the electrical appliances that can really economize the use of energy. To choosing which new power plant isn’t helpful for us, it doesn’t matter what we choose because the energy still make money.

3.For government officer:
> 20% off for our tax, it is not enough. We require tax is free, and we should get the pension back.
>We don’t want the simple health check; we require free insurance and cover all health care; because no one knows how serious the power plants influence our health.
>we really don’t want to live with such huge building; we suggest that it is better to examine which place the big consumer is for electric power; if is not here, so don’t build here.
>It is government’s responsible to make the policies in order limit energy wasting.